Will 'Making a Murderer' Change How Jurors Think?

Fri, 01/15/2016 - 12:42pm
Kenny Herzog, Vulture

(Shutterstock)Anyone who tuned in to Netflix’s Making a Murderer, HBO’s The Jinx, or NPR’s Serial podcast probably indulged a fantasy that, had they sat on any of those juries, fair verdicts would have been meted out. 

The maddening reality, however — and part of what’s made all the above mini-series so addictive — is that our indignation’s been collectively stoked by an overwhelming presentation of evidence and testimony that could have only been accrued in the years following each case’s respective trials.

But does that suggest that, post–Steven Avery, Brendan Dassey, Robert Durst, and Adnan Masud Syed — the aforementioned broadcasts’ polarizing subjects — attorneys will suddenly be selecting from a more cynical jury pool?

Read more.

Source: Vulture


Share this Story

You may login with either your assigned username or your e-mail address.
The password field is case sensitive.