HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE!  |  ARTICLES  |  BUYER'S GUIDE  |  WEBINARS  |  JOB BOARD  |  ADVERTISING Tuesday, February 09, 2010
EVENTS  •  EDITORIAL  •  CONTACT US View Article Archives  •  Site Search:

FREE Magazine Subscription
Digital Edition
Magazine Articles
Industry News
E-Newsletter Archive
Buyer's Guide
Advertising Services
2009 Media Guide
Forensic Jobs
Author Guidelines
Shows, Conferences & Events
Contact Forensic Magazine®
Home Page
Subscribe to
Forensic Magazine® RSS
Refer a colleague to Forensic Magazine®

Subscribe to receive more articles like this: Print/digital | Webfeed (RSS)

  

The Safety Guys: Blood, Sweat and Fears, BBP, Part 1

By: Vince McLeod, CIH and Glenn Ketcham, CIH  
Issue: April/May 2006


Untitled Document

Blood, Sweat, and Fears BBP - Part I

A significant concern for forensic scientists is preventing contact with potentially contaminated body fluids, whether it is during collection of evidence in the field or evaluation and analysis in the laboratory. Inadvertent exposure to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), or other human pathogens is a potential occupational risk that should never be overlooked. Even so, needle-sticks, cuts, splashes, and other events contribute to an alarming number of exposures each year. This issue the Safety Guys aim to raise awareness and prevention of blood-borne pathogen (BBP) exposures beginning with an overview of the OSHA standard and discussion of the Center for Disease Control’s Universal Precautions.1

Not too long ago the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) was requested to perform a health hazard evaluation (HHE) for an Arizona sheriff’s office evidence drying room.2The HHE was performed to address concerns about employee exposures to potential biological hazards, including blood-borne pathogens. What the investigators found – poor BBP practices and a lack of adequate ventilation combined with a non-existent preventative maintenance program — is probably typical of many forensic settings and prompted the topic for this column.

Preventing exposures to blood-borne pathogens begins with strong implementation of OSHA’s BBP standard, 40 CFR 1910.1030.3This standard applies to all occupational exposures to blood or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM). Blood means as human blood, components thereof or products made from human blood. OPIM is defined as human body fluids such as semen, vaginal secretions, cerebrospinal fluid, synovial fluid, pleural fluid, pericardial fluid, peritoneal fluid, amniotic fluid, or any body fluid that is visibly contaminated with blood. OPIM also includes any unfixed tissue or organ (other than intact skin) from a human (living or dead) and HIV-containing cell cultures or tissues.

Applying the OSHA BBP standard starts with developing an Exposure Control Plan (ECP), a mandated, written document designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposures. The ECP must be reviewed and updated annually and include documented consideration or implementation of new technology or safer medical devices to achieve its purpose. The main elements of the ECP are 1) exposure determinations, 2) communication of hazards to employees, 3) methods of compliance, and 4) record-keeping. Exposure determination is simply a list of employee classifications, tasks, and procedures in which occupational exposures occur and are made without regard to personal protective equipment. Compliance methods include universal precautions, engineering and work practice controls, personal protective equipment, and housekeeping issues, especially waste handling. Other ECP elements address Hepatitis B vaccination and post-exposure evaluation and HIV/HBV research laboratories. The latter is not usually applicable to forensic activities.

Although the heart of OSHA’s BBP standard lies in the Methods of Compliance section, we prefer to begin with training, or communicating the hazards. It is paramount that every employee has a solid understanding of which fluids present infection hazards and which do not. Be concerned with blood and OPIM, which have been defined above. Other fluids typically encountered that are not covered by the BBP standard include vomitus, feces, urine, sweat, tears, sputum, and nasal secretions UNLESS these are visibly contaminated with blood. However, one would obviously still want to avoid direct skin contact with these fluids as well. So, make sure everyone knows which fluids present the greatest risks. The next piece of the puzzle is to learn the avenues of potential exposure. These are: 1) through the skin; 2) through mucous membranes (nose, mouth and eyes); and 3) parenteral, a medical term for injection or breaking the skin barrier. The last exposure route results from needlesticks, cuts, abrasions, and other such injuries. The final piece of the training puzzle is to know how to protect against potential exposures and that leads us back to Methods of Compliance.

The golden rule of preventing exposures is the one of Universal Precautions. Most forensic scientists reading this have the Universal Precautions tattooed on the backs of their eyeballs. Refreshing your memory never hurts, so here goes. First and foremost, all blood and OPIM are always considered infectious. Therefore, you must prevent contact through the use of appropriate personal protective equipment that will create barriers between the fluids of concern and the routes of exposure. Personal protective equipment is considered "appropriate" only if it does not permit blood or other potentially infectious materials to pass through or reach the employee's clothes, skin, eyes, mouth, or other mucous membranes during normal conditions of use. Under the OSHA standard, when there is occupational exposure, the employer shall provide all employees at risk, at no cost to the employee, appropriate personal protective equipment such as, but not limited to, gloves, gowns, laboratory coats, face shields or masks, and eye protection, pocket masks, or other ventilation devices.

For most forensic scientists, normal activities always entail the use of gloves as the primary means of preventing contact with blood and OPIM. Gloves are worn when it can be reasonably anticipated that the employee may have hand contact with blood, other potentially infectious materials, mucous membranes, or non-intact skin. Gloves are also worn for handling items or surfaces soiled with blood or body fluids. Recommendations for the use of gloves are presented in detail in the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report dated June 24, 1988.4Our advice is to buy good quality, powder-free, non-latex gloves, and plenty of them.

The next most common piece of PPE used is eye protection. Protective eyewear or face shields are worn to prevent exposure of mucous membranes of the mouth, nose, and eyes during activities or procedures that are likely to generate droplets of blood or body fluids. These types of activities are most common in the laboratory, for instance performing autopsies or preparing and analyzing specimens, but they can also be encountered in the field during investigations and evidence collection. So carry all types, eye glasses, goggles, and face shields, just in case.

After the golden rule of always assuming fluids as infectious and preventing exposure with appropriate, quality barriers, the final part of Universal Precautions, is avoiding injuries and accidents caused by needles, scalpels, and other sharp instruments or devices. Be extremely careful whenever handling these “sharps.” Never recap needles and always have sharps disposal containers available.

References
1) http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/bp_universal_precautions. html

2) http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document? p_table=STANDARDS&p_id=10051

3) http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/hhe/reports/pdfs/1996-0241-2634.pdf

4) http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00000039.htm

Vince McLeod is a Certified Industrial Hygienist by the American Board of Industrial Hygiene and the senior IH with the University of Florida’s Environmental Health and Safety Division. He has 15 years of experience in all facets of occupational health and safety and specializes in hazard evaluation and exposure assessments.

Glenn Ketcham is a Certified Industrial Hygienist with 20 years experience in the health and safety field. He is currently the Risk Manager for the University of Florida. He has worked as a USDOL/OSHA compliance officer and has program management experience in general OSHA compliance, laboratory and chemical safety, workplace ergonomics, loss prevention, disaster preparedness, and classical industrial hygiene.

We welcome your comments and questions.
You can email us at thesafetyguys@forensicmag.com


Untitled Document
Add To Your Favorite Bookmarks
   



Free Magazine Subscription | Magazine Article Index | Digital Issues | Ad Services
Author Guidelines | Shows Conferences, and Events | Contact Forensic Magazine
Subscribe to Forensic Magazine® RSS | About Web Feeds | Home

Copyright ©2010 Vicon Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Proud member of BPA Worldwide. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy