HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE!  |  ARTICLES  |  BUYER'S GUIDE  |  WEBINARS  |  JOB BOARD  |  ADVERTISING Tuesday, February 09, 2010
EVENTS  •  EDITORIAL  •  CONTACT US View Article Archives  •  Site Search:

FREE Magazine Subscription
Digital Edition
Magazine Articles
Industry News
E-Newsletter Archive
Buyer's Guide
Advertising Services
2009 Media Guide
Forensic Jobs
Author Guidelines
Shows, Conferences & Events
Contact Forensic Magazine®
Home Page
Subscribe to
Forensic Magazine® RSS
Refer a colleague to Forensic Magazine®

Subscribe to receive more articles like this: Print/digital | Webfeed (RSS)

  

The Safety Guys

By: Glenn Ketcham, CIH and Vince McLeod, CIH  
Issue: April/May 2007


Office Ergonomics 101 – Part 2

In the last issue we began to explore the ergonomic risk factors associated with the use of computers. Three of the fundamental ergonomic risk factors are: position/posture, repetition/duration, and force. These can all be influenced by the work area setup and the activities being performed. The good news is, these risk conditions that may cause pain and potential injury, can often be easily controlled if one understands basic ergonomic concepts and how to apply them.

To recap, the take-home message in Part 1 was “balanced” and “neutral.” Your monitor should be directly in front of you with the upper edge of the screen at eye-level or slightly below. Any hardcopy you work from should be placed in front of you on a document stand (not on the desk at your side) either between the keyboard and monitor or immediately to the side of the monitor. The keyboard and mouse should be in front of you and generally as close as practical to prevent over-reaching. Your wrists should be straight in both the vertical and lateral axes.

In this issue we will discuss repetition/duration and force as it applies to ergonomic risk in the office setting and some possible solutions to get you through the day pain-free.

REPETITIVE MOTION
Repetition by definition involves doing things over and over again. In repetitive work, these same types of motions are performed using the same parts of the body in the same fashion, time and time again. In activities such as typing, using a mouse, or referencing paper source documents, the affected muscles, tendons, and joints can be used thousands of times a day, week after week, year after year. The risk of injury is even greater when repetitious jobs involve awkward posture (e.g. bent or flexed wrists) or forceful exertions such as repetitive overreaching for the mouse (shoulder and neck pain).

Now in conjunction with neutral and balanced as discussed in Part 1, our goal from an ergonomic standpoint is to reduce the number of repetitions experienced by each set of muscles, tendons, and joints throughout the workday and to allow time for recovery. The body has great capacity to repair itself. Problems arise however when the amount of damage or stress accumulated over the course of time outpaces the body’s ability to repair. This is when we experience pain and if the cumulative damage continues, the potential for serious injury.

Short breaks in repetitive tasks can be of significant benefit. Break up data entry with the variations in activity such as filing, reading, using the copier, or any other type task that uses different muscles and motions than computer use. It is good to include micro-breaks of just a minute or two every half hour or so during data entry campaigns. There is good software now available that tracks keystrokes and mouse movement and alerts you when breaks are appropriate. It is often better to take many small breaks than one long work break during the day.

It is important to examine and analyze the work being performed. Look at this along the same lines as a job hazard analysis where the parts of the job are examined on a task-by-task basis. In many cases we have seen, there is much unnecessary repetitive work because of poor process design (or the process was really not designed at all – it just grew). Questions that should be considered: can parts of this process be automated? Can equipment be linked directly to CPUs for data collection? Can databases be programmed to “talk” to each other? In some instance perhaps barcodes and readers might be used to reduce data entry or in other types of information collection and entry readable/scan-able forms. It is often well worth investing a little time to engineer a solution that will save significant time and effort in the long run.

Often we can trace pain to mouse over-use. This is often combined with poor mouse location. The conventional mouse requires a great amount of work to be directed through one arm, shoulder, and hand. It is often best to try to distribute this work and share it between both sides. One approach is the use of keyboard commands. Most of the commands commonly used can be accomplished by using keyboard commands (for those of you that remember those keyboard commands from the DOS days, they still work. For example in Windows, Ctrl-A will “select all,” Ctrl-C can be used to copy text and Ctrl-V will paste. Look at the menu bar at the top of your document next time you are on the computer; all the selections have one letter is underlined (e.g. File, Edit, View, Table etc.). If you hit Alt and the underlined letter, the drop down menu will expand just as if you mouse clicked on it. Cntl and underlined letter on the commands in the drop down menu will perform that function. This can greatly reduce mouse use and once you get familiar with them will actually speed up your work.

There are now actually at least a couple of “alternative-mice” that place the tracking device between you and the spacebar. This allows one to use both hands for mousing again sharing work between hands.

Some software programs also allow you to automate common tasks (such as inserting your address) with scripts called macros. These can significantly reduce the amount of typing you need to do.

FORCEFUL EXERTION
Force is the amount of muscular effort expended to perform work. Exerting large amounts of force can result in fatigue and contribute to injury. The amount of force exerted depends on a combination of factors, including:

  • The effort with which one strikes an object (e.g. pounding the keyboard).
  • The shape and dimensions of an object you are working with.
  • How you grip an object or tool.
  • The preciseness of motion required doing the task.
  • Duration of force applied by the muscles (e.g., the amount of time spent without a muscle-relaxation break).
  • Awkward postures (over-reaching).

In addition to the pounding the keyboard example, some areas where we find unnecessary force applied are in writing and filing/shelving. There are two general types of grips people use; a “pincher grip” where you press your finger against you thumb and a “power grip,” like you would hold a suitcase. The pincher grip requires much more force and should be avoided when possible (e.g. instead of pulling large files out of a cabinet by grasping with a pincher grip from the top, slide your hand beneath the folder and lift it from the bottom using a power grip).

People often use quite a bit of force holding those standard skinny pens and pencils. Because writing is precise work (you must be able to read what you wrote), there is some resistance between the writing surface and your pen, and the difficulty gripping a thin barrel, you must hold it tightly to maintain control. Much better are those wide-barrel pens and mechanical pencils with the soft grip at the end. One does not need to grip nearly as hard thereby reducing strain on the muscles and tendons. Personal preference does come in here so you might audition a couple of different types to see what feels most comfortable to you. Try to hold the pen as loosely as practical yet still maintain control.

In conjunction with a neutral and balanced posture as discussed in Part 1, our goal from an ergonomic standpoint is to reduce the number of repetitions or duration of exertion experienced by each set of muscles, tendons, and joints throughout the workday and to reduce the force applied to perform the task. There is not usually a single golden bullet that will be a panacea for ones ergonomic woes. OSHA provides an excellent review through their eTool on ergonomics.1The State of Washington also has some very good self-evaluation checklists and guides.2One has to recognize and be cognizant of reducing all these risk factors both on and off the job to effectively reduce the potential for pain and injury.

References

  1. http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/computerworkstations/index.html
  2. http://www.lni.wa.gov/Safety/Topics/Ergonomics/default.asp

Vince McLeod is a Certified Industrial Hygienist by the American Board of Industrial Hygiene and the senior IH with the University of Florida’s Environmental Health and Safety Division. He has 15 years of experience in all facets of occupational health and safety and specializes in hazard evaluation and exposure assessments.

Glenn Ketcham is a Certified Industrial Hygienist with 20 years experience in the health and safety field. He is currently the Risk Manager for the University of Florida. He has worked as a USDOL/OSHA compliance officer and has program management experience in general OSHA compliance, laboratory and chemical safety, workplace ergonomics, loss prevention, disaster preparedness, and classical industrial hygiene.
We welcome your comments and questions.

You can email us at thesafetyguys@forensicmag.com.


Untitled Document
Add To Your Favorite Bookmarks
   



Free Magazine Subscription | Magazine Article Index | Digital Issues | Ad Services
Author Guidelines | Shows Conferences, and Events | Contact Forensic Magazine
Subscribe to Forensic Magazine® RSS | About Web Feeds | Home

Copyright ©2010 Vicon Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Proud member of BPA Worldwide. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy