Forensic Disaster Response: The Crash of Comair 5191
By: Douglas Page
Issue: February/March 2007
Challenges, issues, and solutions of identification in mass disasters differ
with the type and scope of the catastrophe.
At approximately 6:10 A.M. on Sunday, August 27, 2006, Comair Flight 5191
taxied into takeoff position at Blue Grass Airport in Lexington, Kentucky.
Neither tower controllers nor the crew on the flight deck noticed the aircraft
had turned on to unlit secondary Runway 26 — only half as long as intended
7000 ft. primary Runway 22.
Too soon after the Bombardier CRJ-100ER began its
takeoff roll the 50 seat commuter aircraft ran out of concrete. With the crew
fighting to get the doomed plane airborne, the plane’s landing gear clipped
an 8 ft. perimeter fence at 158 mph with its tail dragging the ground. The
plane failed to clear a nearby grove of trees; the tail separating from the
fuselage. The aircraft then slammed into a hillside no more than 1000 ft. from
the end of the runway and exploded.
A PLANE IS DOWN
Less than 90 minutes later, University of Louisville dentistry professor Mark
Bernstein, DDS, and a diplomat of the American Board of Forensic Odontology,
home asleep in nearby Borden, IN, is informed by Tracey Corey, MD, the Chief
Medical Examiner (CME) of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, to assemble his odontology
team. A plane is down at Bluegrass Airport, 50 onboard, one survivor.
“Although
I lecture on mass disaster preparedness as a component of a University of
Louisville Bioterrorism grant, and recently participated in a mock disaster
exercise at the Greater Cincinnati Airport, the immediate reaction to such
news is momentary confusion and inaction,” Bernstein said.
The shock is transient. Bernstein immediately passes the word to faculty colleague
Ryan Noble, DDS. Within minutes the remaining members of Bernstein’s
odontology team – Drs. James Woodward, William Lee, and Corky Deaton – are
also notified, as is Virginia Woodward, the team’s dental hygienist.
All are to report to the medical examiner’s facility in Frankfort, 18
miles from the crash site.
Bernstein and Noble first swing by the University School of Dentistry to gather
supplies and equipment that have been stored for just such events. There is
one snag. The mobile x-ray unit is not exactly portable — it weighs 500
pounds and must be dismantled, then somehow maneuvered into Bernstein’s
SUV. Campus police help hoist the unit. Other gear in the emergency cache includes
antemortem and postmortem dental charting forms, a computer, a Dexis digital
x-ray probe and software package, miscellaneous containers, and a digital camera.
The odontologists depart for the state forensic laboratory in Frankfort, arriving
by noon, before the bodies.
“A perimeter of security surrounds the building
but we are anticipated, and promptly admitted,” Bernstein said.
Meanwhile,
Corey and Fayette County coroner Gary Ginn have activated the remainder of
the mass disaster team, including 22 coroners, seven pathologists, and Emily
Craig, Ph.D., the state anthropologist.
BODY RECOVERY
Members of the Kentucky Mass Disaster Team (KMDT), a group of county coroners
from the Kentucky Coroners Association formed in the early 1990s to respond
to state mass fatality incidents, are already at the crash scene, removing
bodies from the wreckage. First members of KMDT are on the scene within 30-45
minutes.
“Coroners do the body recovery,” said Lee, who happens
to be the coroner of Hardin County (and the only coroner-dentist in Kentucky).
Corey said Kentucky is lucky that it already had in place a mass fatality
response team of experienced death investigators.
“When I arrived at
the scene many of them were already on hand,” she said.
Over the years, the medical examiner’s office and KMDT had trained and
formulated disaster plans and procedures. Plans must be flexible.
“Every mass fatality incident is going to be unique, and although you
can have policies and procedures you are always going to have to modify those
procedures to fit the situation that arises,” Corey said.
Unlike Hurricane Katrina, where victims were widely scattered, here crash
victims are confined, facilitating recovery. By 4 P.M., remains begin arriving
at the
Frankfort morgue, where they are logged, placed on gurneys, and rolled into
refrigerated trucks positioned earlier in a secure area.
“Sometimes,
you might have to work in a tent or temporary facility, but here we were fortunate
to be so close to the Medical Examiner’s Office in Frankfort,” Lee
said.
Once the morgue operations are ready, bodies are brought in groups, tagged,
photographed, and personal effects catalogued.
Mistaken identity of the dead
at mass fatality incidents is always a risk. In April, 2006, a terrible
mistake was made after two Indiana college students who resembled each other
were
involved in a car crash near Fort Wayne, Indiana. One died, one survived
comatose. The
family of the deceased was told their daughter had died in the crash, only
to learn five weeks later that the victims had been misidentified at the
scene.
Lexington circumstances are different, but Corey takes no chances;
she requires
that a coroner accompany each victim to each station during identification,
eliminating any potential for mislabeling or loss. Days later, as the
bodies are released to families, Corey double checks each body bag, just to
be sure.
IDENTIFICATION PROCESS “ All victims display varying degrees of fire
effect,” Bernstein said. “Many have blunt force trauma.”
Clothing
is removed first and autopsies performed by the pathologists, who not only
look for identification clues but attempt to determine cause of death. While
all deaths are related to the crash, specific cause for each individual – whether
from injuries from the impact or smoke inhalation – must be ascertained
for the death certificate.
“A person might have had a heart attack and
be dead before the crash,” Lee said.
After autopsy, the remains go to dental processing, where Bernstein exposes
the dentition, noting fracture patterns, dental damage, airway soot, color
of tissues.
“These factors may help reconstruct the cause of death,” he
said. The hygienist, who serves a scribe, records the findings. Odontology
teams photograph the dentition and chart the dental findings on standard postmortem
forms.
Victims are then returned to the trucks.
The forensic teams work until 9:30 P.M. Sunday night and return at 7 Monday
morning. By Monday evening all 49 decedents have been examined.
“Remarkably,
almost no teeth or jaw fragments are lost or co-mingled,” Bernstein said.
One segment of an upper jaw not present with its remains is found at the scene
two days later.
FAMILY ASSISTANCE
Elsewhere, Comair arranges for the victims’ families to gather at a Lexington
motel. FEMA’s Disaster Mortuary Operational Response Team (DMORT) family
assistance crew, along with the Fayette County coroner’s office, are busy
collecting medical and dental records of those on Flight 5191’s manifest.
Family assistance is critical.
“Someone must sit down with 49 emotionally
charged families and ask them detailed questions to help identification – color
and length of hair, color and length of fingernails, and so forth,” Lee
said. “You need people who are trained for this.”
All crash victims
are adults, most are locals, and most have considerable dental work – factors
that contribute to rapid acquisition of antemortem dental records. The local
medical community responds compassionately, Bernstein said.
“Indeed, 47
antemortem records were received by Tuesday,” he said. By Tuesday evening
antemortem records and postmortem records are matched and tentative identifications
are being made.
Bernstein organizes the antemortem records into two groups, male and female.
The most characteristic feature of each victim is selected, then postmortem
records from that gender group are visually scanned to find matching characteristics.
“If
only one postmortem record showed a similar characteristic, it was considered
a tentative identification,” Bernstein said. If more than one victim
shared the characteristic, a second characteristic is selected for comparison.
Bernstein said that for each tentative identification made, confirmation is
established by comparing all charted dental features, noting any dental similarities
while accounting for any discrepancies. Most identifications are straightforward.
“Some
are difficult, either because of little dental work or the antemortem records
are old and temporal changes have occurred,” he said. In these instances,
digital postmortem radiographs are used to compare with antemortem films.
“Radiographs
provide specific dental silhouette patterns and show subtle anatomic features
that can be objectively compared with precision to ensure identification,” Bernstein
said.
In the end, dental comparisons establish 47 identifications. Of the two individuals
on whom no dental records are obtained, one is identified by fingerprints
and the other by a radiographic comparison of an antemortem x-ray of a
previously
damaged finger bone.
All 49 victims are positively identified by Wednesday evening.
DEJA VU
The loss of Flight 5191 is the first mass fatality incident in Kentucky since
a 1988 bus crash.
“Comparison of each accident illustrates why it is
axiomatic that no single protocol for managing mass fatalities is appropriate
in all situations,” Bernstein said.
In both incidents, victims were
burned but remained relatively intact, and dental records were quickly recovered.
However, because the bus victims were children, there was very little dental
work.
“Children lose teeth and new ones erupt so rapidly, their antemortem
radiographs of only a few months earlier appeared much changed from current
dentitions,” Bernstein said. This mandated making dental radiographs
on each victim and copying antemortem radiographs on each patient so that subtle
anatomic features of teeth and bone could be compared, a difficult and time
consuming task.
Flight 5191 response was managed differently.
The decision
to delay making dental x-rays and not to copy all of the antemortem x-rays
was made because clinical attributes quickly documented by digital photography
rendered so much dental information that these comparisons alone allowed unconditional
identification in most cases. In cases where there was any uncertainty, radiographic
comparisons were performed.
“This modification saved time while not compromising
accuracy, thus optimizing the identification effort,” Bernstein said.
Dental results were presented to Corey, who cross-checked them against suspected
identification based on personal effects, medical records, and anthropologic
data.
“The rapidity and effectiveness of the response allowed us to release
the remains to families as quickly as possible without compromising accuracy,” Bernstein
said.
Corey said her strongest advice to other CMEs or disaster planners who may
have to direct a response is to find the right people.
“The most important
thing in planning is to have contacts with forensic people with experience
and expertise who you will need to call on,” she said.
Identification Clues, Like the Phoenix, Rise from the
Ashes
Forensic science can sometimes fail to identify disaster victims.
Explosions and intense fires leave precious little to work with. Traditional
dental x-ray comparison may be unsuccessful if structural relationships
of the jaw are lost. When airplanes crash soon after takeoff with a full
load of fuel, ensuing fires are long and hot. Teeth warp, making traditional
forensic identification impossible.
In a new development, University
at Buffalo (UB) forensic dental researchers have found that evidence
still exists among the ashes when all else – flesh, bones, teeth, DNA – is
lost. Researchers there have demonstrated that inorganic resins that make
up the central matrix of dental fillings not only withstand temperatures
of 1,800°F, they can be recovered and identified.
“When fire
burns hot enough and long enough, all other clues are destroyed,” said
Mary Bush, DDS, assistant professor of Restorative Dentistry, UB’s
School of Dental Medicine. Identification at this point can only be made
from nonbiological evidence found with the victim. Dental prosthesis, such
as crowns and partial dentures, are examples of nonbiologicals that survive
inferno conditions, she said.
Bush found that not only are resin fillings retrievable, but they can
be identified by brand or brand group. Brand groups are important
because some manufacturers use the same inorganic elemental formulations.
“Inorganic
elements stay virtually unchanged even after cremation conditions,” Bush
said.
These materials can then be checked against dental charts to
provide identifying information when other means of identification
are exhausted. Or, it can provide ancillary certainty if other clues
remain.
Odontologists have noticed this work. “Forensic dentists
have all seen the effects of high heat on filling materials, but this
research documents these effects for use by odontologists,” said
forensic odontologist Ann Norrlander, DDS, a University of Minnesota
assistant professor of Diagnostic and Biological Sciences.
In most
cases where destruction of dental evidence is minimal to moderate,
odontologists will continue to rely on dental radiographs alone for
comparisons, but with severe dentition destruction, information collected
through the Bush method may make the difference between a possible
or positive identification and one where determination is impossible,
Norrlander said.
Arnold S. Hermanson, a Prairie Village, Kansas, dentist, and member
of the American Society of Forensic Odontol-ogy, said Bush has created
a taxonom-ic chart of the composite kingdom.
“This database
will allow investigators to speciate every resin ever placed in a
tooth,” Hermanson said. “With portable equipment, on-site brand
identification can be made.”
So far, Bush’s technique works
well in the lab, but further work remains before it appears in the field.
In a new paper (Journal of Forensic Science, Jan 2007) Bush reports the
possibility of using a portable x-ray fluorescence detector to perform
field analysis.
“This hair-dryer sized machine will show a spectrum
in about six seconds,” Bush said. The spectrum is based on elemental
composition, which are compared to known compounds.
Identification of restorative material is rendered useless, however,
if dentists don’t accurately record type and brand of material
used.
“Quality dental record-keeping has been a historic
problem facing forensic odontology,” said UB researcher
Raymond Miller, a UB clinical assistant professor of Oral Diagnostic
Sciences.
Miller said dental education needs to emphasize the importance
of maintaining accurate dental records, including not just
procedure but materials and brands.
“Restorative dentists need
to understand the forensic value of this information,” he said. “The
circumstance may be rare, but the results may bring justice
or closure to a complex case.”
–DP
Douglas Page writes about forensic science and medicine from Pine Mountain,
California. He can be reached at douglaspage@earthlink.net.