HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE!  |  ARTICLES  |  BUYER'S GUIDE  |  WEBINARS  |  JOB BOARD  |  ADVERTISING Tuesday, February 09, 2010
EVENTS  •  EDITORIAL  •  CONTACT US View Article Archives  •  Site Search:

FREE Magazine Subscription
Digital Edition
Magazine Articles
Industry News
E-Newsletter Archive
Buyer's Guide
Advertising Services
2009 Media Guide
Forensic Jobs
Author Guidelines
Shows, Conferences & Events
Contact Forensic Magazine®
Home Page
Subscribe to
Forensic Magazine® RSS
Refer a colleague to Forensic Magazine®

Subscribe to receive more articles like this: Print/digital | Webfeed (RSS)

  

The Safety Guys: Flow Down!

By: Vince McLeod, CIH and Glenn Ketcham, CIH  
Issue: Dec. 2006/Jan. 2007


Untitled Document

About a year ago we wrote about the fundamentals of chemical fume hoods in response to a reader question regarding storage inside the exhaust cabinet. In that article we discussed the basic design principles and operation of chemical fume hoods. Since exhaust hoods are one of the major expense items for most laboratories they have a huge impact on continuing operational costs. Therefore, we decided to provide you with information on some of the newer designs offering performance and energy conservation.

Laboratory exhaust systems fall into three main classes: chemical fume hoods for working with corrosive acids and bases, volatile solvents, and other hazardous chemicals; biological safety hoods which can be designed to protect the work (clean air bench) or the worker (true biosafety cabinet); and standard exhaust hoods typically used in mechanical or machine shops or production areas. For this article we are going to limit our discussion to the chemical fume hood, what is found in almost all forensic investigative laboratories.

Laboratory fume hoods are designed to protect the worker by containing and exhausting harmful or toxic fumes, gases, or vapors from chemicals used in the hood. An exhaust blower is typically mounted on the roof or in an exterior penthouse so that room air from the laboratory is pulled into and through the hood, creating directional airflow into the hood. Remote mounting of the blower ensures that the entire system is under suction so if a leak develops everything is drawn in and nothing gets pushed out of the exhaust duct. The “pull” at the hood opening is termed the “face velocity” and is usually measured in feet per minute. Proper face velocity of the hood is critical in maintaining protection for the worker. Too little flow allows room air currents or disturbances to overpower the hood and draw chemicals or vapors into the room. Too much flow can result in turbulence and eddies that also lead to contaminates escaping the hood. Baffles and other aerodynamically designed components determine how air moves into and through the hood. Contaminates inside the hood are diluted with room air and exhausted outside by the hood’s duct system where they are dispersed. The volume of air exhausted by the hood depends on a number of factors, most important of which are hood size and design. With average chemical fume hoods exhausting around 750 to 1000 cubic feet per minute of conditioned air, you can see how hoods put a large load on the laboratory’s heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning system and thus impact the operational costs. Let’s look at some of the different chemical fume hood designs available and their pros and cons.

CONSTANT AIR VOLUME
There are two basic types of laboratory fume hoods: conventional and by-pass. Conventional hoods consist of a basic enclosure with a movable sash (or window). Since the face velocity or “pull” is a function of the total volume divided by the area of the sash opening, closing the sash on a conventional CAV hood will increase the face velocity. The conventional hood’s performance depends primarily on sash position. However, as the sash is closed down velocities can increase to the point where they disturb instrumentation and delicate apparatus, cool hot plates, and slow reactions or create turbulence that can force contaminates into the room.

By-pass hoods contain openings above the sash in addition to an air foil sill that will redirect the air flow as the sash is closed. The by-pass openings reduce the changes in face velocity to a narrow range by keeping the area for air flow equal (within the limits of the by-pass) as the sash is moved up or down. Therefore, face velocities do not reach the detrimental levels of conventional hoods. For this reason, by-pass hoods hold a major share of the market today.

Recent models of by-pass hoods, called high-performance or “low flow” hoods, have improved containment and safety features as well as energy saving designs. These design features vary by manufacturer, obviously, but generally have one or more of the following: sash stops or horizontal-sliding sashes to limit the openings; sash position and airflow sensors that can control mechanical baffles; small fans to create an air curtain barrier in the operator’s breathing zone; refined aerodynamic designs and variable dual-baffle systems to maintain laminar (undisturbed, non-turbulent) flow through the hood. Although the initial cost of a high performance hood is slightly more than a conventional by-pass hood, the improved containment and flow characteristics allow these hoods to operate at face velocities as low as 60 fpm which can translate into $2000 per year or more in energy savings depending on hood size and sash settings.1

In laboratory settings where the tasks might be very specific and unchanging for the most part, a variation of the “low flow” hood referred to as the reduced air volume (RAV) hood is an option to consider. This design incorporates a by-pass block to partially close off the by-pass reducing the air volume and thus conserving energy. Usually, the block is combined with a sash stop to limit the height of the sash opening ensuring a safe face velocity during normal operation while lowering the hood’s air volume. By reducing the air volume the RAV hood can operate with a smaller blower which is another cost saving advantage.

One downside to the RAV hood is that with its restricted sash movement and reduced air volume, the realm of tasks and flexibility of use is also constrained. Another major caution to note is the potential to override or disengage the sash stop. If this occurs the face velocity could drop to an unsafe level. To counter this condition, train operators to never override the sash stop while in use, only for loading or cleaning the hood. In addition, an air flow monitor is always recommended.

VARIABLE AIR VOLUME
The newest generations of laboratory fume hoods vary the volume of room air exhausted while maintaining the face velocity at a pre-determined level. Variable air volume (VAV) hoods change the exhaust volume using different methods such as a damper or valve in the exhaust duct that opens and closes based on sash position or a blower that changes speed to meet air volume demands. Most VAV hoods integrate a modified by-pass block system that will ensure adequate air flow at all sash positions. They are connected electronically to the laboratory building’s HVAC so hood exhaust and room supplies are balanced. In addition, VAV hoods feature monitors and/or alarms that warn the operator of unsafe hood airflow conditions.

Although VAV hoods are much more complex than traditional constant volume hoods with corresponding higher initial costs, they can provide considerable energy savings by reducing the total volume of conditioned air exhausted from the laboratory. Since most hoods are operated the entire time a laboratory is open, this can quickly add up to significant cost savings.

References

1. How to Select the Right Laboratory Hood System, Labconco Corporation, Kansas City, MO. 2003.

Other Sources

http://www.research.northwestern.edu/research/ors/labsafe/ hoods/index.htm

http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document? p_table=STANDARDS&p_id=10107

Vince McLeod is a Certified Industrial Hygienist by the American Board of Industrial Hygiene and the senior IH with the University of Florida’s Environmental Health and Safety Division. He has 15 years of experience in all facets of occupational health and safety and specializes in hazard evaluation and exposure assessments.

Glenn Ketcham is a Certified Industrial Hygienist with 20 years experience in the health and safety field. He is currently the Risk Manager for the University of Florida. He has worked as a USDOL/OSHA compliance officer and has program management experience in general OSHA compliance, laboratory and chemical safety, workplace ergonomics, loss prevention, disaster preparedness, and classical industrial hygiene.

We welcome your comments and questions.
You can email us at thesafetyguys@forensicmag.com


Untitled Document
Add To Your Favorite Bookmarks
   



Free Magazine Subscription | Magazine Article Index | Digital Issues | Ad Services
Author Guidelines | Shows Conferences, and Events | Contact Forensic Magazine
Subscribe to Forensic Magazine® RSS | About Web Feeds | Home

Copyright ©2010 Vicon Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Proud member of BPA Worldwide. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy